In the end had a last decision now ruling to refund 5 aside from eight loans

Logged criticism beggining out of 2016. Adjudicator said reimburse all of the eight money. We hope QQ will pay out punctually. QQ said i experienced an equilibrium due from one thousand. Shared with FOS proof that we paid off all the money. Concluding decision provides specifically considered are currency paid down so you can debt collecter inside calculation. Hoping i’m into the last challenge now 🙂

Effects you should be advised rapidly this new redress matter nevertheless usually time seven-21 months to have fee, that’s ironic after they can also be import a leading appeal financing into the 15 minutes.

Having got Casheuronet reject adjudicators choice back to Can get and not having read anything I phoned FOS to enquire in the event the my complaint was found from the ombudsmen is informed you to Casheuronet had generated a deal away from amicable settlement. The idea is We would not understand right now you to this promote stayed easily hadn’t phoned. When was FOS services browsing let me know to allow me personally to take on. Worse instance circumstances is if Casheuronet drop the new bowl and you may these types of now offers had been sitting inside someone’s inbox to have weeks or weeks. Now I know the fresh FOS is under pressure and you may Casheuronet is actually a long way off out of collapsing but this is very important to help you people who have the says. The FOS are a national muscles who need to stand up to scrutiny, openness and you will liability

they have acknowledged certain. However, rejected a lot. And frequently they generate a bench bring. You may be proud of six-21 say, however, presumably wouldn’t be pleased with thirteen-21.

Whenever 17 fund try over 6 ages as i 1st reported

I got a keen adjudication choice when you look at the April one fund 3 to 29 was indeed irresponsible lending and really should be paid into complete. QQ refuted obviously and since awaiting a keen Ombudsman in order to make the concluding decision.

We spoke in order to FOS again almost every other time and now have an offer from QQ getting ?4k which is half of extent it owe. I’ve refuted however, at least everything is description moving today. We hope might provide a far greater give so we is also romantic it

CashEuronet (Short Quid) disagreed entirely with my adjudication take a look at. Yet not, new subsequent conversations relate with tech issues about its entitlement so you can reject the fresh new adjudication look at. Up until this dilemma was solved, your own circumstances and some equivalent anybody else will stay ‘on the hold’. I will revise you whenever you will find any advancements.

Hi every, FOS enjoys influenced in my own favour to possess money 5 – 21, QQ possess up until 30th not holding my air with this particular you to definitely and are pregnant which to get another step 3 day waiting once the I am predicting this will head to ombudsman

I’m in identical problem QQ reacting with the help of our technical facts back to May and you will I am nevertheless waiting. Apparently they don’t end up being delivered to the ombudsman up until such conversations was basically solved.

Hi Zoe just what I’m struggling to see is what may be the technology points? and just why QQ shell out some and never anybody else it is difficult it is not-being managed to move on for somebody to make a decision that way or some other.

you could potentially query FOS what QQ’s technical arguments is. Unless you understand, it’s difficult to suppose as to the reasons the case are influenced by him or her while some appear to aren’t.

Hi Sara most of the I have been told through brand new adjudicator try their decision hasn’t changed while the choice are taken on increased phase yet not yet the Obudsman phase. Why should it not move to one stage in any event when the QQ dint agree with the Adjudicator anyhow.