Social Desirability Measure
, 2016) are a home-report measure, with 20 bits of dichotomous effect (yes/no), validated towards the a long time inside sample. Analogy things are “Maybe you have detested some one?” and you may “Have you exploited some one?” Prior to studies analyses, all of the people was in fact screened to own public desirability, governing out kids exactly who scored more than M = , because they presented a propensity to shown socially popular answers rather than choosing answers which might be a real reflection of their behavior otherwise feelings (Grimm, 2010). Cronbach’s alpha to own full level are.80.
Abusive Sexting
Kids was in fact questioned a couple questions about sexting habits: (a) abusive sexting: “Maybe you have shared sexually direct photographs otherwise films out of almost every other people in the place of the consent?”; and (b) abusive sexting victimization: “Enjoys sexually specific images otherwise movies from oneself actually ever started common with other people in place of their concur?.” Answers was ranked given that 0 = No, step one = Sure.
Young people Notice Statement
Youngsters self report (YSR; Achenbach and you can Rescorla, 2001; Portuguese variation: Goncalves et al., 2007). Brand new YSR is a self-statement survey available for school-decades students and kids (age 11?18) to locate self-studies out-of emotional, behavioural, and you can personal dilemmas. Products are rated with the a about three-part scale (0 = untrue, step one = somewhat or both genuine, and you may dos = best shown or commonly genuine), in line with the preceding half a year. Inside research, the brand new syndromes Stressed/Despair (13 situations; elizabeth.g., “Personally i think meaningless otherwise inferior”; ? = 0.85), Personal Difficulties (eleven things; e.g., “I do not get along with most other infants”; ? = 0.78), Opposition (Rule Breaking) Conclusion (16 affairs; age.g., “I slashed classes otherwise ignore college or university”; ? = 0.60), and you will Competitive Behavior (17 activities; age.g., “We destroy anything owned by someone else”; ? = 0.84) were used. With respect to the conditions ideal by the Ponterotto and you will Ruckdeschel (2007) about your adequacy of inner surface procedures, and you will as a result of the limited leader worth of Opposition Behavior subscale (? = 0.60) additionally the number of items (sixteen situations), we made a decision to eradicate so it size out-of mathematical investigation.
Catalog away from Callous-Unemotional Faculties
Index of callous-unemotional traits [ICU; Essau ainsi que hookup bar Milwaukee al., 2006; Portuguese adaptation of the Pechorro mais aussi al. (2014)]. The brand new ICU is a survey built to determine callous and unemotional characteristics for the an effective 4-section level ranging from 0 (“Not real”) to 3 (“Of course correct”). Which level has been utilized which have health-related and you may people examples of teens ranging from early adolescence to later puberty/emerging adulthood (age range = 12–2 decades). About three subscales were utilized: Uncaring (seven facts; e.g., “I cover-up my feelings away from someone else”; ? = 0.86), Callousness (eleven affairs; e.g., “I really don’t care which We harm locate everything i want”; ? = 0.72), and you may Unemotional (four factors; “I’m crappy or responsible when i take action wrong”; ? = 0.43). Even in the event the lowest value of leader might possibly be because of a great lower amount of issues (Nunnally, 1978), i made a decision to eradicate which size from comparative statistical studies.
Youngsters Stress Survey
Youngsters trauma questionnaire [CTQ; Bernstein mais aussi al., 2003; Portuguese variation by Dias ainsi que al. (2013)]. The newest CTQ are a good 28-item survey aligned so you’re able to measure notice-said childhood stress records inside the teenage and you can adult communities (from a dozen years old). Answers is actually measured toward an effective 5-section Likert scale function 1 (“Never genuine”) to help you 5 (“That frequently correct”). Teens trauma is counted playing with five subscales: Mental discipline (elizabeth.grams., “I thought that my moms and dads desired I got not ever been created”; ? = 0.81), Psychological neglect (elizabeth.grams., “I believed treasured”; ? = 0.82), Sexual discipline (e.grams., “I think that we was sexually abused”; ? = 0.89), Actual discipline (elizabeth.grams., “In my opinion that we is actually myself mistreated”; ? = 0.83), and you may Actual overlook (e.grams., “There isn’t adequate to eat”; ? = 0.60). For each subscale include four items, and you can a supplementary around three products are intended to size people tendency to minimize otherwise deny the discipline.