B. Quinn, The Western pictures away from John White, step one577-1590 (2 vols
2. William Camden, Historie . (London, 1630), III, pp. 61-62; Jerome E. Brooks, Tobacco: its Record Depicted . throughout the Collection regarding George Arents (5 vols., Nyc, 1937-52), I, pp. 46-49; II, pp. 156-158; R. Letter. Salaman, The annals and you can Public Determine of your Potato (Cambridge, 1949), pp. 83-96; Quinn, Roanoke Voyages , I, pp. 344-348.
BIGGES, WALTER. A beneficial Summarie and True Commentary out-of Sir Frances [sic] Drakes Western Indian Trip. (First line out-of name and a few statements trimmed.) That have woodcut printer’s mark of Richard Occupation towards identity. 4 makes, 37 (1) pp., step one empty leaf. Short quarto. Morocco.
Next ENGLISH Model, wrote an identical 12 months as earliest. Today’s Roger Ward version is apparently reduced notorious as compared to Richard Profession edition (STC 3056) and this preceded they an equivalent seasons–comprehend the prior amount. STC-Bishop-Ramage to obtain merely 4 copies of Ward edition as up against 11 of the Community. Today’s backup comes with the leaf till the label, empty with the exception of the latest trademark-draw “Good,” therefore the blank leaf in the bottom.
F.” is actually delivered to ocean towards the March cuatro, 1589, for the true purpose of reconnoitering the Iberian coasts in preparation having the fresh new Drake-Norris expedition regarding 1589
STC 3057; Sabin 20841; Church 136 (note); Waters (ed.), True and you can Perfecte Newes . Syr Frauncis Drake , pp. 53-70; Quinn, ed., Brand new Roanoke Voyages , We, pp. 32-thirty five.
“T. He provides development of one’s destiny of your own Invincible Armada from the earlier year: “And also as regarding last Fleete, [a beneficial marchant off Lisbone] sayth, regarding the ships and you can carvels of your Language Fleete there are return home but nine and you can thirtie. but the majority of all of the men one to came house passed away immediatly from the their getting. Also the Duke away from Medina are banished the fresh new Judge for good.” This second detail is quite not true–Queen Philip didn’t fault this new Duke toward inability regarding the fresh Armada campaign. He including brings ins and outs of a naval step out of Lisbon inside and therefore an excellent Greek boat loaded with drink off Crete was captured, and you may forecasts higher triumph to the upcoming assault.
(WINGFIELD, ANTHONY). A genuine Coppie out of a discourse compiled by a guy, in new later Trip out of Spaine and you will Portingale. dos will leave, 58 pp., step one blank leaf. (Pp. 27-31 lacking, given in photostat.) Woodcut vignette for the name. Small quarto. Old boards, fabric right back.
Earliest Edition, Earliest Thing. Wingfield’s story is the most in depth account extant of 1589 assault towards the The country of spain commanded from the Sir Francis Drake and Sir John Norreys (Norris), and therefore sailed out loveagain of Plymouth to the April 17, 1589, and you can returned later for the June. Yet not, an unnumbered later listing gives Wingfield because the writer. step 1
The trip were unsuccessful within the prominent mission, the latest increasing away from a good rebellion in Portugal up against Queen Philip II of Spain, and also the enthroning from Dom Antonio, the past men offshoot of Aviz dynasty, in Philip’s lay. They did a certain amount of problems for Language naval shipping at Corunna, along with particular marks of your Armada of your earlier season; and over 60 vessels full of corn and you may naval supplies and that the new English considered to be contraband was in fact taken near Lisbon in the Hanse.
In the STC the publication was incorrectly ascribed so you can Queen Elizabeth’s favorite, Robert Devereux, Earl out of Essex, who participated in the new expedition–far up against the Queen’s commonly–while the a volunteer
Two issues of this work are extant; signature E (pp. 25-32), which relates events of the attack upon Lisbon, in some copies (including this one) contains a passage in praise of the Earl of Essex on p. 26 (E 1 verso). As Queen Elizabeth was highly displeased with the Earl’s running off on this voyage against her orders, it is perhaps likely that the issue with the passage is the earlier of the two.
